Latent Prints and Footwear

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​The Latent Print and Footwear Unit utilizes visual examinations as w​ell as chemical and physical processing methods to develop and preserve friction ridge and footwear impression evidence.

Latent print analysis is the examination of friction ridge impressions left behind on a surface by the friction ridge skin on a person’s fingers, palms, or feet. Friction ridge skin is highly discriminating and persists in the same arrangement throughout a person’s lifetime. Questioned friction ridge impressions can be compared with known standards to identify or exclude a person as having touched an object and can also be searched against known standards in the Wisconsin Automated Fingerprint Identification System (AFIS) and FBI Next Generation Identification (NGI).​

Footwear analysis is the examination of questioned footwear impressions left behind on a surface due to the bottom of a shoe contacting a surface. This contact can leave behind characteristics and features of the shoe which allow the questioned impression to be compared to known footwear standards to establish identity, exclusions, or associations.

Questioned footwear can also be submitted for a Footwear Investigative Lead Search to attempt to determine the possible make(s) & model(s) of the footwear that made it.​


Day in the Life - Latent Print and Footwear​


​​Services

  • Chemical & physical processing of submitted evidence for questioned friction ridge impressions
  • Comparing questioned friction ridge impressions with known standards to identify or exclude individuals
  • Searching questioned friction ridge impressions against the Wisconsin repository of known friction ridge standards (AFIS) and the FBI’s repository of known friction ridge standards (Next Generation Identification – NGI)
  • Generating reports based on the results of friction ridge examinations
  • Providing expert testimony on reported findings
  • Providing help with identifying unknown deceased individuals
  • Assisting law enforcement agencies with cold cases

  • Chemical & physical processing of submitted evidence for questioned footwear impressions
  • Comparing questioned footwear impressions with known footwear standards to identify, exclude, or associate the footwear
  • Generating reports based on the results of footwear examinations
  • Providing expert testimony on reported findings
  • Footwear Investigative Lead Searching, which may provide the possible make(s) and model(s) of the footwear that made a questioned impression
  • Generating reports based on the results of the investigative lead search


​Submis​sio​n FAQs​

Elimination standard prints (both fingers and palms) of anyone who had contact with the evidence should be submitted for comparison whether or not there is a suspect in the case. Providing elimination prints limits the amount of time spent searching victim prints through the AF​IS/NGI system. It also informs the agency if they have any evidence remaining on the case (if the latent prints get excluded to the victim/eliminations, they may then belong to a suspect). If elimination prints are requested via a WSCL Report, please provide them to the laboratory.

The WSCL accepts digital evidence images both physically on electronic storage media (e.g., CD, DVD) and electronically via ShareFile or e-mail. Please contact the Laboratory in your area to set up a ShareFile account. Images should be scaled, with the scale on the same plane as the impression, the impression should fill the frame, and a tripod should always be used. Impressions used for comparative analysis should be captured in the highest resolution lossless format available (i.e., RAW or TIF) and the impression should be in focus. All digital images of impressions should be submitted for examination even if the physical evidence is submitted as well.

  • The value (whether monetary or sentimental) of items being submitted for latent processing should be ascertained prior to their submission to the WSCL. Chemical processes used by the Latent Prints and Footwear Unit can cause permanent damage to electronics, collectibles, antiques, etc. 
  • If the evidence was processed by the agency prior to its submission to the WSCL, notations regarding prior processes performed should be indicated on the Transmittal to assist the laboratory on further processing and preservation. 
  • Any latent prints or footwear observed on an item should be photographed properly with a scale prior to submission to the laboratory and these images should be submitted to the WSCL (see above) with the items. 
  • Porous (i.e., paper) items should never be processed with fingerprint powders. 
  • Submitters should refrain from making marks or notations, such as possible conclusions, on items of evidence (e.g., circling impressions) because latent impressions are often invisible to the naked eye and the markings can destroy or obliterate impressions that could have been of value for comparison purposes.

Rush cases, including court dates or court orders, violent crimes against persons (e.g., homicides, sexual assaults), and other high-profile cases are considered the highest priorities and will be worked first. All other cases are examined on a first in, first out basis. Please contact the WSCL to notify us of any updated information on court dates or reasons that cases need to be expedited.

Whenever possible, it is best to submit standard fingerprints and palm prints for any suspects, victims, or other individuals who may have been in contact with the item. Even though a person may have an arrest record in the State of Wisconsin, this does not always mean that they have the necessary standards on file for comparison with any unknown prints. Often times, fingerprint cards are missing some areas of friction ridge detail, such as the tips and sides of the fingers, and palm print standards are often not taken.

Due to the nature of AFIS/NGI and latent prints, even if a record is in the system it may not “hit”. Low quality, incompletely rolled fingerprint cards may not contain the detail observed in the latent print. Additionally, both latent and standard prints can show signs of movement and distortion which may interfere with them “hitting” in the system. While AF​​IS/NGI are valuable tools, they are not as accurate as a trained fingerprint examiner.


​​
Fingerprint Standards FAQs​​​

In order to obtain fingerprint/palm print standards from the Crime Information Bureau or the FBI, please provide the complete name and date of birth of the individual and a Wisconsin State Identification Number (SID#) and/or an FBI#, if possible. The WSCL is not able to acquire cards from other states using their SID#s, so if you cannot get an FBI number, please contact that state and request a comparison quality/certified fingerprint card print-out which can then be submitted to the laboratory. We cannot accept fingerprint cards for comparison via e-mail, however a digital copy of a standard can be submitted on electronic storage media or electronically via ShareFile or email if it is at least 1000ppi and in TIF format.

Law Enforcement applicants have only been retained in the AFIS since 2010. If you were hired prior to that date, or if you haven't applied for a Law Enforcement Officer position since then, your card is not in the system. Please submit standards for any law enforcement personnel who had contact with submitted evidence.


Examination Results​ FAQs​

No Identification or Exclusion means that the examiner is unable to identify or exclude the source of the questioned latent print. This may be due to the quality of the latent print, the quality of the known prints, poorly rolled known standards that do not contain the appropriate area of friction ridge detail for comparison, or if the latent print does not meet the WSCL exclusion requirements. A latent print that does not meet the exclusion requirements may be able to be identified if compared to the correct standards.

Many latent prints searched through the AFIS/NGI systems will be registered into the unsolved latent file if they do not “hit” on the initial search. These prints will automatically continue to be checked against all new known standard prints as they are entered into the system. If a “hit” is made and verified due to a subsequent search, a report will be issued to notify the submitter of this new information. Please notify the WSCL if your case does not need additional analysis and can be deleted from the unsolved latent file.


​​








​​